Jadi Kaya dan Rendah Hati

Thursday, November 22, 2012

119 Komentar Tentang Smartphones Sony Xperia

Sony Xperia


THE XPERIA T IS SONY'S NEW FLAGSHIP

TheConductor says:
Sony’s math: T+V=iP4/4S
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:38 AM EDTReply
Tuan X's reply:
Yet another year of smartphone failure from Sony.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:43 AM EDTReply
Vikash's reply:
They look pretty good, don’t they? I hope the processors are S4’s this time. I don’t get where this whole “they’re now copying iPhone” shit is coming from though? Maybe I’m just an idiot.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 1:48 PM EDTReply
Tuan X's reply:
When I speak on failure, I speak on the fact that most people could care less about Sony’s Android smartphones & their design is bland at best.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 1:59 PM EDTReply
Vikash's reply:
Really? from what I observed, many people are really fond of the the design of the previous Android powered Sony handsets.
You have your opinion, that’s fair enough, I just don’t get how you can forecast Sony’s sales based on that opinion.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 2:05 PM EDTReply
Tuan X's reply:
Based on previous sales & market penetration, amongst other things, as most forecasters do.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 4:04 PM EDTReply
nickerson.t's reply:
Of course, that’s all that matters. /s
Or maybe it’s just a lazy way to apply the pecking order to a consumer device? They’re beautiful, original designs. The S is an absolutely beautiful design. I would be proud to take it out of my pocket and feel less of a tool than if I bought the dated iPhone 4/S.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:37 PM EDTReply
nico_mach's reply:
These are the best smartphones designs out there, imo. Extremely strong, and Sony has excellent build quality. Too bad they never really come to America.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 2:58 PM EDTReply
TheConductor says:
We have now come full circle:
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:39 AM EDTReply
Glengeorge's reply:
And that is an apple design. Not Sony design.. And lol at Apple ripping Sony off. Okay then
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:44 AM EDT via mobileReply
ravenyu's reply:
They didn’t copy Sony. Try to read more.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:44 AM EDTReply
krazyfrog's reply:
You’re implying that they read more than headlines and saw pictures.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:08 AM EDTReply
Seven2k7's reply:
again dude….they were inspired by sony. they made a phone that was inspired by sony.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:24 AM EDTReply
ravenyu's reply:
Please try not to mislead people… This is an Apple-designed iPhone mock-up with a Sony logo on it (it was a joke). Apple did not copy Sony. In fact, Sony was inspired by Apple’s iPod.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:42 AM EDTReply
TheConductor's reply:
Yup, for the record, the original article about Sony design (upon which t
he iPhone 4 prototype design was based) was about the following device:
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:44 AM EDTReply
Nickedynick's reply:
At least TheConductor is capable of intelligent and reasoned discussion…
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 12:18 PM EDTReply
Seven2k7's reply:
he post the same shit in every post.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 12:51 PM EDTReply
ultraviol3tlux says:
Sony’s designs lately are such a bore.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:42 AM EDTReply
james dot heck's reply:
You got it! lol
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 4:29 PM EDTReply
nickerson.t's reply:
dood. My phone gets more sales/apps/dicksuck than yours, okay? ’nuff said.
Anyways, since I bought my phone there’s no way I would justify the phone I didn’t buy cause that would be so self-depreciating.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:44 PM EDTReply
debacle says:
What happened to the XPERIA Go? Was that ever released in the US?
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:42 AM EDTReply
quicktek's reply:
I don’t think so. They aren’t selling it unlocked in their store either, but you can get them on eBay for $250 -300. I really wish they would release the Acro S.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:27 AM EDTReply
lolstebbo's reply:
New name, Newegg.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 12:29 PM EDTReply
Glengeorge says:
Too many xperia phones. I have no idea which is what. HTC and Sony need t sort this out. Getting too confusing. Oddly Samsung sees to have streamlined the naming
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:45 AM EDT via mobileReply
Glengeorge's reply:
Hey at least Samsung has streamlined its flagship. And it seems to have relegated the sgs2 to take over the budget. And Note line for pen input.
Of course it’s still like being a cockeyed man in the land of the blind
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:50 AM EDT via mobileReply
redbullcat's reply:
So have HTC. Htc have the One X as their flagship, the One S as their mid-range model, and the One V as the low-end model. Then there’s the Desire C, which I think takes the place of the Wildfire at ultra-low end.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:59 AM EDTReply
Glengeorge's reply:
Actually, one second thought, like u said below, Samsung has way more crap at the lower end. HTC i thin (hope) eventually moves to the one line. They need just 1 flagship, 1 middle end and a few low ends in diff markets
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:01 AM EDTReply
Glengeorge's reply:
But i dont see the point of the desire line. they can merge it with the One V line..stick to line. If samsung has done anything is ..that the galaxy brand name is popular now. HTC needs a keyword/buzzword people know of. Changing branding every year wont help
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:03 AM EDTReply
Ashutosh's reply:
There are about a dozen different Galaxy phones all over the world, starting from as low as $120 off-contract. Samsung and “streamlining” don’t go together.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:01 AM EDTReply
Glengeorge's reply:
yea yea..u r right..I only thought of the SGS3 and how that single model is the flagship everywhere inc US
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:01 AM EDTReply
BranFlake30's reply:
there are 3 HTC phones. One V,S,X
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:47 AM EDTReply
gadgetluva's reply:
Then you have the EVO 4G LTE, the Incredible 3, the Desire series in China, etc. etc.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:48 AM EDTReply
redbullcat's reply:
Yeah but those countries carriers require different phones for various reasons. I’m never ever going to see the HTC Desire series from China, for example.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:49 AM EDTReply
SamDu's reply:
But you will see the EVO 4g LTE. Which is basically a One X, but not exactly.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:02 AM EDTReply
MrLadoodle's reply:
Its pretty much a complete different phone apart from the screen, camera and software.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:04 AM EDTReply
kirbha's reply:
Yes because useless sprint wants something different…brainless carriers just leave the OEM’s to do the work and work on improving your network.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:20 AM EDTReply
MrLadoodle's reply:
Excuse me? The “dumb pipe SIM-card” model works perfectly. It forces competition, interoperability and better prices.
Something the US clearly lacks.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:39 AM EDTReply
redbullcat's reply:
I live in the UK. There are four HTC 2012 models here: One X, S, V, then the Desire C, which is kinda an anomaly.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:04 AM EDTReply
redbullcat's reply:
And as Mr Ladoodle said below:
They are carrier specific brands and not HTC’s flagship line. They are not HTC’s fault.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:05 AM EDTReply
lolstebbo's reply:
And the Droid Incredible 4G LTE. Which is like a kinda-beefed-up One S, but not exactly.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:15 AM EDTReply
gadgetluva's reply:
Um, no. One need look no further than the Galaxy S III to realize that is not a true statement. Some internals maybe the same, but for most consumers, the Galaxy S is a strong brand associated with Samsung and it IS Android for many,
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:52 AM EDTReply
BranFlake30's reply:
yes because im on multiple carriers in multiple countries /s
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:54 AM EDTReply
debacle's reply:
You forgot the EVO and Droid branches.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:48 AM EDTReply
Tsuki's reply:
Droid is Motorola
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:49 AM EDTReply
malteschulz's reply:
No, Droid is Verizon.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:56 AM EDTReply
CaptainDoug's reply:
what he said.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:57 AM EDTReply
CaptainDoug's reply:
Samsung droid charge
HTC Droid incredible
HTC droid incredible 2
HTC droid incredible 4G
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:56 AM EDTReply
CaptainDoug's reply:
And HTC Droid Eris
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:59 AM EDTReply
MrLadoodle's reply:
They are carrier specific brands and not HTC’s flagship line. They are not HTC’s fault.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:50 AM EDTReply
redbullcat's reply:
Exactly.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:58 AM EDTReply
malteschulz's reply:
In what way are they not HTC’s fault, they agree to make carrier branded devices.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:08 AM EDTReply
MrLadoodle's reply:
Because they are paid to make the variants or carrier line phones.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:13 AM EDTReply
Glengeorge's reply:
U have desire… Evo… Etc..
I know it doesn’t matter. These devices are not defining. Just there to fill showroom space
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:51 AM EDT via mobileReply
MrLadoodle's reply:
The Desire C is also one of HTC’s mainline budget phones, and is not carrier specific.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:51 AM EDTReply
redbullcat's reply:
HTC have the One series and that’s about it. That’s in Europe, the US is a mess because carriers require different phones. In the UK, I’ve only seen three 2012 HTC’s: the One X, the One S and the One V.
Meanwhile, Samsung have about three million phones in the Galaxy brand. Samsung Galaxy Ace, Ace 2, Ace Plus, Galaxy Advance, Galaxy S III, Galaxy S II…I could go on.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:48 AM EDTReply
Glengeorge's reply:
Yeah u r right. The Samsung is ko better. But HTC has desire.. Evo still going
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:52 AM EDT via mobileReply
tsjmcgrath's reply:
We still have 17 phones on sale in the UK though (although that is including some of the phones HTC likes to forget about, such as the ChaCha).
Ugh. I can’t stand how many Galaxy Aces there are here – they really are terrible. I get really rather annoyed every time I see that Three advert for ‘a shiny new Galaxy Ace smartphone’.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:53 AM EDTReply
redbullcat's reply:
But they’re not making the ChaCha, Status, Sensation (awesome phone btw, I have one myself) any more. It’s just the carriers and shops trying to sell them off.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:57 AM EDTReply
redbullcat's reply:
Forgot about the Desire C. No idea why that isn’t a One series model though.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:00 AM EDTReply
Arthur V.*'s reply:
but HTC and Sony did streamline their offerings:
HTC with the One series (X, S and V) and the lower-end models.
Sony with the NXT (“next”) series (S, P and U) and the lower-end moels, and now with the yet-to-be-named series (T, V and J).
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:22 AM EDTReply
Hallon's reply:
More phones is better for finding one with all of your top priorities. I want a powerful phone, not mid-range, with a 4.3" 720p screen, not a giant 4.7 or 4.8". I also want lots of storage for holding my music collection. The Xperia V does all that.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 6:33 PM EDTReply
tsjmcgrath says:
Eh… They look a bit bland compared to Sony’s past ventures. There isn’t much to make them stand out from the crowd, unlike the Xperia S, P and U.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:47 AM EDTReply
cybik says:
So they don’t update the X10 but base a NEW phone off of a very close chipset. Kinda miffed.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:49 AM EDTReply
25LifeCrisis's reply:
exactly why i will not touch a sony product
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:55 AM EDTReply
Ramyramzzz's reply:
J has 512 MB of RAM, X10 had 256.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:47 AM EDTReply
brian.k says:
Let’s see…..
iPhone, iPhone, and…yep, iPhone.
All look-alikes and copies. Or at least that’s what the Apple lawyers are thinking.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:50 AM EDTReply
redbullcat's reply:
I really hope you’re being sarcastic…if so, I can’t tell sarcasm on the internet.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:01 AM EDTReply
Wh@tever's reply:
This is boring, sarcastic or not
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:27 AM EDTReply
Bionix's reply:
Grow up.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:31 AM EDTReply
Tsuki says:
Bland design… Never thought that I would ever criticize Sony of this.
Anyways, it seems like things have come full circle. Sony is copying Apple now.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:51 AM EDTReply
Wh@tever's reply:
How on earth is this copying Apple?
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:26 AM EDTReply
SixFingeredAmish says:
Are those virtual buttons? Will these be the first non-G-Nexi with virtual buttons?
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:56 AM EDTReply
redbullcat's reply:
Nah, Motorola have the Atrix HD with virtual buttons.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:02 AM EDTReply
NemaCystX's reply:
Motorola has its new phones coming out soon that will have virtual keys too, so its not just the Galaxy Nexus, don’t forget about Asus’ Padfone too
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:03 AM EDTReply
WasAPasserBy says:
They copied Samsung!
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 10:57 AM EDTReply
NemaCystX says:
I love the Xperia T, sadly it probably won’t come to any carriers around here
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:02 AM EDTReply
lolstebbo's reply:
Where you at? Apparently, Sony’s got the “LT30at” reserved, which means it might appear on AT&T in, like, a year or something.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 7:22 PM EDTReply
sabret00the says:
The bezel is too big. We’re approaching the age whereby we want the screen to reach the edge of the phones. The line for XPERIA is just too much. I wish them better luck next year.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:03 AM EDTReply
surft says:
Damn, no new Xperia Mini? I was expecting Sony to do something insane, like a quad-core chip and 2 gigs of RAM to power a 3.0-2.5inch screen phone:P
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:04 AM EDTReply
Webran61 says:
Launching with ICS according to other sources.
Total “meh.”
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:06 AM EDTReply
azsxdc says:
Engadget reports that it is 9.35mm. The thickness is no issue to me but it does seem thick compared other phones, the thinner SGSIII squeezes in a bigger battery that is user replaceable, this one is not.
Anyway, if it comes with a MicroSD card slot and a good screen, this one shoots to the top of my list. Glad to see the on screen buttons but I’m not sure why this is not consistent across the line-up.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:09 AM EDTReply
Ramyramzzz's reply:
Comes with 32 GB built in, Micro SD, and HD White Magic display with Bravia Engine.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:48 AM EDTReply
azsxdc's reply:
Thanks, I must have missed that. Storage sounds good but the LT30p’s White Magic display wasn’t so well received.
Posted on Aug 30, 2012 | 2:58 AM EDTReply
malteschulz says:
Am I the only one that finds it weird that the “flagship” Xperia T is missing LTE, yet the more mid-range Xperia V has LTE?
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:10 AM EDTReply
redbullcat's reply:
Haven’t seen the specs of these phones, but maybe the Xperia T is Tegra 3, which has problems with LTE chips.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:12 AM EDTReply
malteschulz's reply:
Then why wouldn’t they use the S4 Pro quad-core processor that LG is using in their new Optimus G. Seems kinda questionable to not include LTE in top of the line phones, at this point.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:18 AM EDTReply
redbullcat's reply:
Sony seem to have problems getting the latest chips. When the Xperia S launched earlier this year, it has Snapdragon S3, not S4, which was very new then. Now S4 Pro is quite near, Sony are only just launching a phone with S4.
They seem to always be one generation behind.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:27 AM EDTReply
Wh@tever's reply:
No it has dual core s4 which is lte friendly
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:24 AM EDTReply
Wh@tever says:
Battery time look average too which is a shame
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:25 AM EDTReply
LeFrenchFab says:
I wonder why smaller screens should be synonym of middle or low-end phones… I don’t want a 4.3 inch phone, let alone a 4.8. But I want all the bells and whistles…
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:26 AM EDTReply
Wh@tever's reply:
Yeh if someone released a flagship 4" phone id buy it and move on from Apple
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:29 AM EDTReply
Lorre's reply:
I agree 200%. 4inch with a 16:9 screen is the perfect form factor for me. Best one I could find in this size is the Sony Xperia P. These new phones look bland to me, compared to the NXT line, so no incentive to upgrade here (not that I would, my phone is only 4 months old).
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:38 AM EDTReply
Hallon's reply:
4" 720p is probably hard to do economically. It also uses more battery. So are you OK with 960×540? The other problem is LTE and the best processors use a lot of juice. A large battery means a thick phone. Are you OK with that compromise?
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 6:38 PM EDTReply
Bionix says:
Quick! Someone create the Xperia A, B, and C!
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:32 AM EDTReply
chrisphillers says:
How is the T the flagship over the V? T’s screen is slightly larger but surely water resistance trumps screen size??
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:50 AM EDTReply
chrisphillers's reply:
PLUS the smaller screen size coupled with the same size battery = the better battery life??
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 11:53 AM EDTReply
tilal6991's reply:
I imagine its because the T has a snapdragon s4 chip and the V has an S3 chip. Just a guess though
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 12:03 PM EDT via Android appReply
chrisphillers's reply:
They both use the similar S4 chipset (the V has 4G compatibly and the T not I think)
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 12:13 PM EDTReply
lolstebbo's reply:
The T and V both use S4 chips; the T uses the 8260A, which isn’t LTE-friendly, while the V uses the 8960, which is LTE-friendly.
But, yeah, the V sounds more like the flagship, if anything.
What’s funnier is the TX (which is more or less just the international version of the GX) uses an S3 chip (unlike the GX which uses an S4).
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 12:20 PM EDTReply
evilapa says:
Three new phones and a tablet and all of them run outdated software just like the rest of the competition. The Android space sure is in a poor state.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 12:01 PM EDT via mobileReply
MrLadoodle says:
Vodafone were quick at announcing them..
http://blog.vodafone.co.uk/2012/08/29/new-sony-xperia-devices-coming-soon-to-vodafone-uk/
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 12:03 PM EDTReply
intellidryad says:
So many Xperias launched this year, yet how many got over to the US? As Far as I know, the Ion is the only one. And no matter how much I would like to have a Sony phone, I would never wanted to pay out of my nose for AT&T.
Message to Sony: get on to any other carrier that is not AT&T, and you get more market share.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 12:09 PM EDTReply
MrLadoodle's reply:
You do realise its because Sony is releasing GSM phones, and most of your networks are CDMA?
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 12:12 PM EDTReply
lolstebbo's reply:
All of them have gotten or will get to the US; Newegg has them.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 12:12 PM EDTReply
nico_mach's reply:
You can buy them from Sony direct for AT&T or T-Mobile. No CDMA, obviously, get on VZW’s case. They only really have two decent phones right now, iphone and Galaxy and maybe the last Droid, if you like keyboards. The US carriers are absolutely the worst, no wonder everyone buys iphones with selections like that.
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 3:01 PM EDTReply
james dot heck says:
Sony is the only android phone manufacturer that understands design
Posted on Aug 29, 2012 | 4:32 PM EDTReply
kitzune113 says:
Should I wait for the Xperia T instead of getting an Xperia S? Anyone has a guess about its price range? I hope it gets released in the Philippines soon.
Posted on Sep 04, 2012 | 2:50 AM EDTReply
rits says:
The Xperia line is so damn confusing now, what is flagship, what is not, the naming (letter=wise) convention is absolutely logicless..
Posted on Oct 10, 2012 | 7:09 AM EDT

Sumber : theverge











Software Akuntansi Customize

Popular Posts

Copyright © Blog Dykapede | Powered by Blogger
Design by Saeed Salam | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com | Distributed By Gooyaabi Templates